Energy companies are struggling to find workers with the right technical skills. The U.S. Department of Energy found that 79% of electric power generation utility employers had some hiring difficulty in 2024. About 36% said hiring was very difficult. Qualifications and location were also common barriers, with each cited by 45% of employers. The 2025 U.S. Energy & Employment Report helps explain why a role can stay open even when many people apply.

The report doesn’t track protection engineers as a separate job group. Protection work often needs specific knowledge of electrical systems, relays, safety controls, and commissioning. Employers may therefore receive many engineering resumes but still find few people who fit the actual job. The main problem is often the match between the engineer’s recent work and the project that needs support.

Protection engineering roles often need a narrow skill match

A protection engineer job can look broad when it appears on a job board. The work itself may be much more specific. One employer may need relay coordination experience, while another may need fire protection or process safety knowledge. The role may also depend on control systems or field commissioning.

A high number of applicants can give hiring teams the wrong signal. Many electrical engineers may meet the basic job title but lack the required protection background. Employers considering a Protection Engineer Staffing Agency should define the systems and project duties before sourcing begins. Clear requirements make it easier to judge real experience instead of relying on a broad title.

Public labor data also points to wider demand for engineering talent. The Bureau of Labor Statistics counted about 287,900 electrical and electronics engineering jobs in 2024. It expects employment in those fields to grow 7% by 2034 and projects about 17,500 openings each year. The BLS electrical and electronics engineer outlook also reports a 2024 median annual wage of $118,780 for the combined group. These figures cover a wider field, but they show that employers are competing for technical workers in an active labor market.

Slow hiring can place more work on smaller technical teams

Protection systems need regular study and testing. Teams may also need to review settings, investigate faults, and complete corrective work. A staffing gap does not prove that a system failure will happen. It can still leave fewer qualified people available for work that cannot be ignored.

NERC’s 2025 State of Reliability found that reported protection system misoperations in 2024 were at their lowest level in 5 years. That is a positive finding. The same report found different results across regions, including an increase in the NPCC region that NERC described as statistically significant. NERC linked part of that rise to repeat misoperations that happened before corrective work was finished. The NERC 2025 State of Reliability assessment shows why protection work still needs steady technical attention.

Hiring teams should not treat this data as proof that open jobs cause misoperations. NERC does not make that claim. The practical issue is staff capacity. Protection systems still need engineers who can test equipment and review faults. They also need people who can finish corrective work on time.

Recent project experience can matter more than a broad resume

A resume may show years of engineering work without showing the experience a project needs. This creates another delay during hiring. Managers may spend several interviews learning whether a candidate has worked with the required relay family or voltage level. They may also need to check experience with a specific industrial system or commissioning process.

Companies that need to Hire Protection Engineers can reduce this delay by setting screening rules before sourcing starts. The job brief should name the systems involved and the type of project work expected. It should also separate required credentials from skills that can be learned after hiring. This gives recruiters and technical managers the same basis for reviewing candidates.

Recent experience needs its own check. A candidate may have strong engineering knowledge but little exposure to the equipment used on the current project. That does not always remove the person from consideration. The employer should decide which skills can be taught within the project schedule and which must already be present.

Infrastructure growth can increase pressure on engineering teams

Electric infrastructure work is growing in several parts of the country. NERC’s 2025 Long-Term Reliability Assessment reported about 41,000 circuit miles of transmission above 100 kV in construction or development over the next 10 years. The prior year’s assessment listed 28,275 miles. NERC said reliability needs were driving 69% of the future transmission miles reported in the 2025 assessment.

This growth creates work across many engineering fields. It does not mean every transmission project will create a protection engineer job. It does mean that utilities and contractors may have more projects competing for technical staff. The same NERC assessment reported 14,150 circuit miles of planned transmission above 400 kV, which shows the size of some projects now under development.

Federal planning points to the same workload issue. In July 2026, the Department of Energy released a draft transmission needs study. It found a pressing need for more transmission infrastructure due to data centers, manufacturing, industrial demand, and wider growth in electricity use. The 2026 National Transmission Needs Study announcement gives employers another reason to plan engineering capacity before a vacancy becomes urgent.

Certification should match the work that needs to be done

Employers sometimes use certification as a fast screening tool. That can help when a license or safety credential is required for the work. It can also remove good candidates when the requirement has no clear link to the project. Each credential should have a specific reason for being part of the job.

A search to Hire Certified Protection Engineers should begin with the project requirement. The hiring team should confirm which license or training is needed and where it must be valid. It should then verify the credential with the issuing body when the role depends on it. This keeps the screening process tied to the actual work.

Experience still needs a separate review. A certification can confirm education or professional standing. It cannot show whether a candidate has handled the same kind of protection issue found on the current project. Managers should check both credentials and recent project duties before making a hiring decision.

Workforce planning should start before the vacancy becomes urgent

Many companies begin specialist recruitment after someone leaves or a project receives approval. That timing can create pressure to accept a weak match. A better approach is to review upcoming protection work and compare it with current staff capacity. This can show whether the need is temporary or likely to continue.

Permanent roles may fit teams with ongoing settings and system study work. Contract support may fit a defined commissioning period or a short-term increase in workload. Companies with uncertain future demand may need another option before they add a permanent position. The staffing model should follow the expected work and the amount of knowledge that must stay inside the company.

Protection Engineer Staffing Services can be one sourcing option when internal hiring is not enough. VALiNTRY describes contract, temp-to-perm, and direct-hire models for protection engineering roles. Employers should compare those models with project length and internal skill coverage. They should also decide how project knowledge will be handed over when an assignment ends.

Technical interviews should reflect the real job

A useful interview should test the work the engineer will face after hiring. Candidates can be asked to explain how they would approach a relevant protection problem. Managers can also review earlier projects and ask which decisions the candidate personally owned. References and credentials should be checked when they affect safety or project approval.

Employers should also explain the work setting early. Site travel and remote locations can affect candidate interest. Field schedules may also shape whether a role is realistic for a qualified engineer. DOE workforce data already shows that location is a common hiring barrier, so hiding these conditions until late in the process can waste time.

Role ownership is another important check. Candidates should know what they will be expected to handle during their first months. They should also know who reviews or approves their work. This gives both sides a clearer basis for deciding whether the role fits.

A better staffing process keeps required work covered

A protection engineering hiring process is working when the company can fill specialist work without lowering its technical requirements. Hiring speed matters, but candidate fit matters as well. Managers should track how long qualified roles stay open and where candidates drop out of the process. Those signals can show where the hiring method needs repair.

The final test is simple. Required protection work should have a qualified owner when it needs to be completed. If repeated vacancies leave studies or commissioning work waiting, the staffing process needs another review. This keeps recruitment tied to the work that operating teams and customers depend on.

Frequently asked questions

Why can protection engineer positions take longer to fill?

Protection engineering often needs a specific mix of technical knowledge and recent project experience. The wider electrical engineering workforce includes many different specialties. A large group of applicants may therefore contain only a few close matches. Employers can reduce delays by defining the technical work before sourcing starts.

Should employers require every possible certification?

Employers should require credentials that support a real licensing, safety, project, or customer need. Extra requirements can remove capable candidates without improving the hire. Each certification should have a clear purpose in the role. Mandatory credentials should also be checked with the issuing body.

Is contract staffing suitable for protection engineering?

Contract staffing can work when a company has a known project period or a short-term skill gap. Permanent hiring may fit better when the workload will continue for several years. Employers should also plan how project knowledge will move back to the internal team. The staffing choice should reflect the length and nature of the work.

How should employers check technical ability?

Start with the systems and decisions the engineer will handle. Ask candidates about similar work and the duties they personally performed. A practical technical discussion can show whether the person’s experience fits the role. References can then confirm the relevant work history.

Does an open protection engineer role create an immediate reliability problem?

An open role does not prove that reliability will suffer. The effect depends on workload, project timing, internal coverage, and the systems involved. Managers should check whether studies or testing are being delayed. Delayed investigations or corrective work can also show that staff capacity needs attention.

How can an employer tell whether the hiring problem has improved?

Qualified candidates should reach interviews without repeated changes to the job requirements. Project teams should also see fewer delays caused by missing protection skills. New hires should be able to perform the defined work after normal onboarding. If the company still relies on constant emergency coverage, the staffing problem has not been fully resolved.

For more info please contact us 1-800-360-1407 or send a mail info@valintry.com to get more quote.